A fool for lesser things

27th June 2012

Photoset reblogged from W2 Was Here with 1,172 notes

ladysisyphus:

thatawkwarddisneymoment:

Dear Disney, 

Why can’t they be beautiful, stylish, and curvy? 

Why to be considered “designer dolls” must they be so skinny?

Sincerely,

Not Okay

That’s, like, Cruella deVille and Astro Boy doing Disney cosplay.

THANK YOU.  Like what, fat women can’t be stylish?  No.  Stop.  Their outfits are really pretty, but they are not made for Ursula and the Queen of Hearts because those skinny little dolls are NOT WHAT THOSE CHARACTERS LOOK LIKE.

Tagged: gif warningepilepsy warningdisneyughno

Source: thatawkwarddisneymoment

4th June 2012

Photoset reblogged from fragile soft machines with 47,118 notes

wayward-may-queen:

theeverydaygoth:

intothekawoosh:

lacigreen:

That awkward moment when people attempt to use science to invalidate the lived experiences of people with vaginas.

I dunno, maybe I’m just reading it differently, but it doesn’t really come off to me as them trying to invalidate the experiences of people with vaginas. Maybe if they had said, “A group of scientists at Yale have determined that there is no such thing as a G-spot” I could agree with you. But from a scientific perspective, there is a HUGE difference between “we have found no proof that [x] exists,” and “we have found proof that [x] doesn’t exist.”

It’s like when scientists say “we don’t know how the bumblebee flies” (we do now though), or “we don’t know why a bike stays stable.” They aren’t saying “bikes fall over when you ride them,” they’re saying “bikes don’t fall over and we haven’t figured out why yet.”

But why are they studying medical literature to find this out when the people writing the medical literature have been stubbornly denying it to make up for the fact that they just can’t find the goddamn thing and suck in bed because it’s not an easily definable bundle of nerves which is how it “should be.”

I’ve actually read more in depth on most of the studies that people are claiming say “there is no g-spot” and really the actual findings are more like “we vastly misunderstand the g-spot”. They are usually more talking about how the g-spot isn’t a magic button/bundle of nerves, it’s actually part of a much more complex system within the genitals that has been painfully understudied because women’s health isn’t studied as much as it should. I have never seen a study that flat out says “g-spots aren’t real and are made up”. They say “wow do we not understand the female orgasm we’re working on it okay”

Unfortunately science reporting is almost universally sensational and misinterpreting shit!  So then everyone hears the news saying things like “Scientists found no proof of g-spot” and interprets it as “scientists are dumb”, when really the scientists were talking about definitions and trying to explain how complicated things really are.

Tagged: gif setmultiple gifsepilepsy warning

Source: kaydeelayne

2nd June 2012

Photoset reblogged from Curious Miscellany with 74,093 notes

memewhore:

I often do.

Tagged: gif warningmultiple gifsgif setepilepsy warningi ship me/me/anyone else who would like to be involvedwe're very happy together

Source: borrowingbones

31st May 2012

Photoset reblogged from free and kind the wilderness with 197,658 notes

killerkaleidoscope:

ryttu3k:

mizura:

ask-lenka:

LOL XD

LMAO XDDDD

There is nothing funnier than a cat losing its shit over something really mundane and then pretending it never happened.

Except a big cat losing its shit over something really mundane and then pretending it never happened 8D

Especially a tiger with a bobbed tail, poor ridiculous thing

Tagged: gif warninggifepilepsy warningbig cats

Source: iraffiruse